PDA

View Full Version : Spamblocker Version



chrisrandell
05-02-2009, 12:37 PM
is there an easy way to tell which version of Spamblocker one is running?




Chris

smtalk
05-02-2009, 12:50 PM
grep release /etc/exim.conf

chrisrandell
05-02-2009, 01:53 PM
thats what i thought smtalk however that gives me no output. i even LOL... interesting needless to say


[root@node1 etc]# uptime
19:45:21 up 51 days, 15 min, 1 user, load average: 0.51, 0.51, 0.61
[root@node1 etc]# grep release /etc/exim.conf
[root@node1 etc]# grep release /etc/exim.conf
[root@node1 etc]# cat /etc/exim.conf | grep release
[root@node1 etc]# cat /etc/exim.conf | grep release
[root@node1 etc]# cat /etc/exim.conf | grep release
[root@node1 etc]
#

as u can see neither gave me an output :S

Anyways i just nanod the exim conf it it said 2.0... so i just did the upgrade to 3.1 , not sure if i want to go to 4.x yet.... are there any reasons i should upgrade to 4.x ? im a firm beliver in if it works dont mess with it...





Chris

***EDIT***
OS = CentOs 5 just incase u were wondering

smtalk
05-02-2009, 02:36 PM
Please post the output of:


head /etc/exim.conf

chrisrandell
05-02-2009, 02:51 PM
That worked as i said i upgraded it just after my first post... wonder why cat didnt work.... :S




[root@node1 /]# head /etc/exim.conf
################################################################################
# DirectAdmin exim.conf 13-Feb-2008 #
# SpamBlocker with Optional VirusBlocker #
# Dovecot Only #
# Version 3.1-beta #
# Exim configuration file for DirectAdmin/Exim 4.60 and above #
# Requires exim.pl as distributed by DirectAdmin here: #
# http://files.directadmin.com/services/exim.pl #
# Dated 31-Oct-2007 10:11 or later #
######### IMPORTANT ########## IMPORTANT ########## IMPORTANT ##################
[root@node1 /]#

floyd
05-03-2009, 06:11 AM
wonder why cat didnt work


Because you were grep'ing for the word "release" which does not exist. grep'ing for "Version" would have worked.

smtalk
05-03-2009, 09:33 AM
Because you were grep'ing for the word "release" which does not exist. grep'ing for "Version" would have worked.

It works with SpamBlocker <3.0 :)

floyd
05-03-2009, 11:07 AM
It works with SpamBlocker <3.0 :)

Right. grep for "release" for <3.0 grep for "Version" for =>3.0

nobaloney
05-03-2009, 05:36 PM
In other words, I haven't been consistent :(. In the future I'll have both release and version (I don't know yet whether or not I'll capitalize them); the version will be more general than the release.

Jeff